Bridging the Divide: The Potential Benefits of a Stronger Dialogue Between the Eating Disorder and Obesity Fields

Dalle Grave, R.

Abstract

The fields of eating disorders and obesity have historically developed along separate trajectories, characterized by distinct conceptual frameworks, clinical services, research agendas, and therapeutic approaches. This segregation has facilitated notable advances in both fields; however, it may now hinder further progress. Increasing evidence indicates a significant overlap between eating disorders and obesity concerning risk factors, underlying mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and public health challenges. Concurrently, the advent of novel treatments for obesity, including GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonists, has raised clinical questions that cannot be adequately addressed by either discipline in isolation. This paper posits that enhanced dialogue between specialists in eating disorders and obesity could enhance prevention strategies, assessment, treatment, and research efforts, while also mitigating the risk of fragmented care. Rather than advocating for the unification of these two distinct disciplines, it recommends increased collaboration predicated on recognition of shared challenges and complementary expertise. Special emphasis is placed on issues such as weight stigma, dietary restraint, body image concerns, binge eating, and the management of patients presenting with both obesity and eating disorder psychopathology.

 

Dalle Grave, R. (2026). Bridging the Divide: The Potential Benefits of a Stronger Dialogue Between the Eating Disorder and Obesity Fields. IJEDO, 8, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.32044/ijedo.2026.09 Full Text